TFTC - Exposing Who Was Really Behind Charlie Kirk’s Assassination | Tom Luongo
Key Takeaways

The episode frames Charlie Kirk’s assassination as a tragic but catalytic inflection point that accelerated a broad “enough is enough” backlash against political violence, pulling previously disengaged Americans into a firmer pro-civility stance. Tom Luongo argues the incident revealed deeper power dynamics, pinning long-running manipulation on the British Crown/“Davos” network and warning against scapegoat narratives (e.g., Israel) meant to fracture Trump’s base. He contends Trump’s measured pace is strategic: reasserting Article II authority, sequencing legal moves (including potential RICO actions) to make reforms impeachment-proof, and resetting separation of powers in the court of public opinion. Economically, he spotlights relisting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a cornerstone for recapitalizing the middle class, restoring access to affordable 30-year mortgages, undermining a “debt-servitude” model, and potentially creating an opportunity he likens to Bitcoin-scale asymmetry. The throughline: resist provocation, reject misdirection, rebuild sovereignty, and “we will not live like this.”
Best Quotes
- “They did not get the response they were hoping for… Civilization is saying, ‘Okay, that’s enough.’”
- “We don’t have to live like this. No, more importantly, we will not live like this.”
- “Assassinating Charlie Kirk like this has now accelerated the process of everybody realizing the actual landscape that we’re operating in.”
- “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing everybody he didn’t exist. At this moment in time, that is the remnant of the British Empire.”
- “Fannie and Freddie may be the most asymmetric trade since Bitcoin.”
- “Freedom of speech is freedom of association, and also freedom from association.”
- “We are here to end feudalism.”
- “If America survives this… then Fannie and Freddie’s relisting is part of that survival.”
- “We will not live like this.”
Conclusion
This episode frames Charlie Kirk’s assassination as more than a political murder, it is a cultural accelerant that has crystallized the stakes of America’s ongoing struggle. Far from sparking riots or despair, the event has awakened a cross-section of society to reject violence, scapegoating, and manipulation. Tom Luongo argues that this moment accelerates Trump’s mandate to reclaim executive authority, dismantle entrenched globalist power, and restore pathways to prosperity for the American middle class through bold economic reforms like the relisting of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The core message resonates beyond politics: Americans must hold to their last inch of sovereignty, refusing to be gaslit or divided, and affirming together, “We will not live like this.”
Timestamps
0:00 - Intro
1:28 - Charlie Kirk, enough is enough
11:23 - RICO cases and memorials
22:07 - Bitkey & Unchained
23:49 - Lone wolf vs coordination
30:10 - Going after the King
32:58 - Obscura & SLNT
35:11 - Department of War and RICO strategy
42:22 - Justice vs moving forward
45:44 - Already hit rock bottom?
50:11 - Opportunity Cost
50:55 - Fed policy and data manipulation
57:32 - Credit markets crisis
1:01:34 - 30-year/Fannie & Freddie
1:15:07 - Staying to fight
1:17:37 - Europe war
1:27:50 - Property tax feudalism
1:31:05 - Moving in the right direction
Transcript
(00:00) that are acting as nothing but super PACs for Davos in front of Democrats and the people who killed Charlie Kirk. Assassinating Charlie Kirk like this has now accelerated the process of everybody realizing the actual landscape that we’re operating here. You killed a lot of people and you did so willingly. The civilized thing is to put you down.
(00:17) It doesn’t actually matter whether he was a lone wolf. Davos are continuing to operate their Gant chart and say, “Well, no, we got to start a race riot.” They were hoping for people to be angry and start burning down cities and it’s not happening. You know what’s happening is that civilization is saying, “Okay, that’s enough.” We talked about it in the context of Trump and Butler.
(00:33) This seems orders of magnitude bigger in terms of vibe shift. I understand the separation of powers just well enough to know that this is part of what had to happen in order for the cries of Trump’s a dictator falls on deaf ears. Putin has had to deal with the same damn thing. Getting control of Russia. The two men’s actions rhyme. He’s not going to leave power.
(00:51) And in 2027, when his term is up, they will manipulate the political situation again to deny people their agency. I think the Russians were sending some reconnaissance drones over Poland because well, Poland is actually helping Ukraine fight Russia. I’m not absolving Israel. What I’m saying is they can easily be a scapegoat. We’re going to go after the king.
(01:08) And when I say the king, I mean the actual goddamn king of England. King Sausage Fingers himself is going to get read the riot act, I think, by Donald Trump next week. Fanny and Freddy are the ninth most profitable company in the world. They would be on the S&P 50. Fanny and Freddy may be the most asymmetric trade since Bitcoin.
(01:29) \[Music\] What a week. Uh I think it was exactly 14 months ago. We met a few days after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. And unfortunately, we’re meeting today in the aftermath of uh Charlie Kirk being assassinated. And uh it seems like I mean we talked about it in the context of Trump and Butler.
(01:54) It seemed like there was a big change there. This seems orders of magnitude bigger in terms of vibe shift. Yeah, I think so because you know they guess you know the guy missed originally. You know had Trump been killed a completely different story, right? And um but what’s going on with with with Charlie Kirk uh and the in the aftermath of it and I’ll be and I’ll cop to this.
(02:19) I didn’t I didn’t really I mean I I I didn’t I didn’t interact I didn’t interact with with Charlie Kirk in that that that se that that segment of you know um American politics for a long long time. I really didn’t. I just kind of like I always looked at Kirk as kind of like oh you know he’s he’s kind of baseline and because we’re so out me and the people that I I circulate in that that that part of the world that I circulate in is so far out you know on the tip of the spear trying to figure out where we are and I always look at Kirk as kind of you know kind of baseline that I just didn’t pay him very
(02:50) much attention and now so I’ve been flabbergasted by the response here about and it I really you know I seriously like I I underestimated uh his reach, his p uh the the uh the impact that he’s had and I’ve had to do some um some recalculation as to where we are uh in a good way like and you know I’ll cop to that but like I I missed this you know completely and watching this occur has been um it’s been edifying honestly watching people finally enough is enough and this is uncool and um this is beyond uncool. This is unacceptable and uh you
(03:37) especially in light of you know the timing of it. It’s like Charlotte, the the Charlotte government clearly tried to suppress the video of Arena Perutka getting, you know, stabbed to death on the subway or on the on public transit. And to have that come out and then the next day have Charlie Kirk get shot and they finally get their their blood sport on national TV effect for all intents and purposes like they tried so desperately to get with Trump. Um, they’ve gotten the wrong they they they did not get the
(04:10) response that they were hoping for. Marty, I don’t know about, you know, I think they were hoping for, you know, people to be angry and start burning down cities and, you know, start, you know, you know, bloping purple hairs in the in in the head in the middle of the street and all the and it’s not happening. You know, what’s happening is that civilization is saying, “Okay, that’s enough, you \[ \_\_ \] people.
(04:30) That’s enough.” So, no, I’m really happy you framed it that way because I think deservedly so, a lot of the focus has been on the radical left-wing reaction and the rebelling in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but I I haven’t heard enough people highlight what you just did is that I think the silver lining positive reaction of people throwing their hands up, saying enough is enough.
(04:58) people who aren’t on social media, who don’t follow politics, basically waking up and saying, “No, this is not acceptable.” I think that’s unfortunately the fact that I had to get here is incredibly sad. It is and disheartening, but I I have been um positively surprised about that part of the reaction, the the positive reaction to um this event. Yeah, I mean, it’s real.
(05:26) It it’s been almost surreal, right? Because we were, you know, I’ve been saying for a long time, I’m like, you know, every time I have I’ve said this, I might have even said it to you the last I can’t remember the you know, I talk in so many different places, but you know, every time I have somebody come out here to do some work on my place or, you know, you know, I hire a guy or I talk to a neighbor or I talk to, you know, and they’ll just kind of look at me after a while, especially after once they find out what I do and what I know and they just go, “Okay, so I I shut you shut up
(05:51) now. just tell me when I get to start shooting them, right? And that’s been the attitude down here in my area of the world for a couple of years now. And and I’ve always said, you know, not yet. That’s not We don’t need to go there yet. It, you know, and then we get to the point where they start shooting quote unquote us.
(06:17) And I don’t wa
Write a comment