‘Bigger and better than ever’: how Durham Pride beat Reform’s funding axe with help from the miners

Solidarity between LGBTQ+ people and unions has saved an event denied ‘a single penny’ of council money
‘Bigger and better than ever’: how Durham Pride beat Reform’s funding axe with help from the miners

‘Bigger and better than ever’: how Durham Pride beat Reform’s funding axe with help from the miners Durham Pride saw record numbers this year, fueled by significant funding from trade unions after Reform UK, which controls the county council, withdrew council funding. This resurgence highlights the enduring solidarity between the LGBTQ+ community and mining unions, dating back to the 1980s miners’ strikes. Trade unions like the Durham Miners’ Association, Equity, and others stepped in to cover the lost council funding, reportedly raising even more money than was cut. This collaborative effort ensured the event could proceed, featuring a larger scale and headliner. The decision by Reform UK to defund Pride was criticized by local politicians and attendees, who framed it as divisive and counter to the inclusive values represented by the parade and the historical relationship between the LGBTQ+ community and the mining sector.

  • Durham Pride experienced its largest attendance ever this year, largely due to substantial funding from trade unions.
  • Reform UK, after taking control of Durham county council, withdrew funding for the Pride event.
  • The LGBTQ+ community and trade unions have a historical bond stemming from the 1980s miners’ strikes, where the community provided support.
  • Trade unions, including the Durham Miners’ Association, Equity, and others, collectively raised funds to replace the cut council money, reportedly exceeding the original amount.
  • The increased union involvement led to a larger and more vibrant Pride event than in previous years.
  • Local politicians and attendees expressed pride in the solidarity shown by the trade union movement in supporting the event.
  • A Reform UK spokesperson stated that the council’s decision was to prioritize core local services and that private funding demonstrated the event could proceed without taxpayer money.
Write a comment