‘Burn for us’: The real message of US-EU ‘nuclear sharing’

Washington has made Brussels another offer the Europeans are too slavish to refuse – even if it paints a giant target on their backs
‘Burn for us’: The real message of US-EU ‘nuclear sharing’

‘Burn for us’: The real message of US-EU ‘nuclear sharing’ The US is offering European NATO allies a “nuclear sharing” arrangement where American nuclear weapons are stationed on their territory, making these countries targets for retaliation. This practice, described as a breach of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, involves complex agreements where the US retains ultimate control over the weapons. Despite the obvious dangers and potential for a devastating nuclear war, European leaders appear eager to accept this offer, prioritizing American interests over their own security.

  • The US is offering “nuclear sharing” to NATO allies, involving the stationing of American nuclear weapons on European soil.
  • Critics argue this arrangement violates the 1968 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
  • Under “nuclear sharing,” European countries become targets for nuclear retaliation while the US retains full control of the weapons.
  • While a “dual key” system is mentioned, the US president is the sole decision-maker for the use of these weapons.
  • Several European countries participate in programs that facilitate the delivery of US nuclear weapons, and some are eager to host them.
  • The author suggests that European leaders are too “slavish” to the US, accepting dangerous offers that prioritize American strategic interests over European security.
  • The article questions why European nations agree to such arrangements, given the catastrophic disadvantages and the increased risk of becoming a proxy war battleground.
Write a comment
No comments yet.