The New York Times The US military has conducted over 80 attacks on suspected drug-carrying vessels since early September, but lacks specific intelligence on the individuals being killed, raising concerns similar to past counter-terrorism strategies that led to collateral damage. Critics argue that this approach targets low-level individuals and destroys potential intelligence, hindering efforts to dismantle drug cartels. While proponents suggest improved aerial surveillance reduces collateral damage, lawmakers express moral objections and fear negative repercussions from killing those with minor roles in drug trafficking.

• The US military has attacked over 80 suspected drug-carrying vessels since September, but does not know the identities of those killed.
• Critics argue this strategy targets low-level individuals and destroys intelligence, unlike past counter-terrorism efforts focused on understanding and dismantling networks from the top down.
• The approach is seen as counterproductive, potentially creating more adversaries by killing individuals with minor roles in drug trafficking.
• Proponents cite improved aerial surveillance and reduced collateral damage compared to land-based attacks.
• Some lawmakers compare the current operations to past ‘pattern of life’ counter-terrorism strikes, which were controversial due to potential civilian casualties and lack of specific intelligence.
• The military asserts these are not ‘pattern of life’ attacks but are focused on the drugs themselves, with the individuals on board considered collateral damage.