The Exclusive Club Deception: Why "Zap Circles" on Nostr are the Same Old Shit in a New Bottle
Remember that electric whisper that promised freedom? A place where merit was determined by ideas, not circus games. Well, forget it. They’re building the same exclusive club, with the same locks, but they pretend the keys are decentralized. The first, great lie of Nostr is unfolding before our eyes: you didn’t escape the platforms. You just arrived early at the new casino’s opening, and now you’re acting like the croupiers.
I’m talking about you, early adopters. Or, to be more precise, that noisy circle that has transformed an open protocol into their own fenced-in backyard. You replaced likes with zaps. Followers with paid “nip-05”s. And the recommendation algorithm? With a parasitic symbiosis of reciprocal zapping, amplifying quotes, and convenient reposts. You exchange monetary value (those sats, the dollar’s shadow) like chips in a private game, just to artificially inflate each other’s reputation. It’s an attention cartel. A human algorithm, slow and smug.
The Scheme, Unveiled
-
The Implicit Pact: “I heavily zap your empty but clever thread, you do the same with mine.” The result? Your names appear at the top of the “most zapped” board. The common user, bewildered, reads this as a signal of quality. It’s a carnival trick. You’re polluting the reputational signal at its source.
-
The Smoke Screen of Complexity: You talk about “layers”, “protocols”, “experimental clients”. A jargon that serves one purpose: maintaining the barrier to entry. To make the newcomer feel like a fool, to make them believe that wisdom resides only in those who can afford to play with satoshis as if they were candy. You’re replicating the worst dynamic of crypto-elites: using technical complexity as a tool for social exclusion.
-
The Extraction of Human Value: You lure sincere people, eager for a better place, into your game. Their hopes, their energy, their time become the fuel for your status machine. You exploit the desire for community to feed a hierarchy. It’s more insidious than an engagement algorithm: it’s an affiliation algorithm, and you are its privileged nodes.
How to Defuse the Farce
Stop looking at them. It’s that simple. Their power exists only if acknowledged.
- Don’t Zap Noise. A zap is not a “like”. It’s a vote with economic value. Treat it with the seriousness of a political vote. Give it to an artist, a toolmaker, someone who solves a problem. Not to the “guru” who has only learned to speak the language of the circuit.
- Ignore the Celebrity Board. It’s the trap. The most zapped are not the best, they are the most skilled at the game. Look for side conversations, profiles with few followers but dense replies. There, perhaps, something real is growing.
- Expose, Gently but Firmly. When you see a circle-jerk of zapping, name the dynamic. In a public reply. Without anger, with the clear annoyance of someone who has seen this movie too many times. “Interesting how this thread gathered 50k sat from 5 people who usually exchange 50k sat with each other.” Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
The protocol is neutral. It will withstand anything. But the culture we are building in these first, crucial days is taking a disgustingly familiar turn: not that of the commons, but that of the country club.
We don’t need new features. We need a collective and visceral rejection of these logics. The only zap we should make is a massive zap of disengagement from their dynamics.
Leave them in their drawing room exchanging satoshis and hot air. We, in the meantime, have a world to build. Elsewhere.
Write a comment