Carroll Couldn’t Remember the Year. But She Remembered to Lie The article scrutinizes E. Jean Carroll’s civil suit against Donald Trump, highlighting inconsistencies in her recollection of the alleged assault and questioning her motivations due to her public statements about spending the awarded money. It also discusses a reported Justice Department investigation into potential perjury and financial support for Carroll’s case from a Democratic donor.

• E. Jean Carroll filed a civil suit against Donald Trump alleging sexual assault over 30 years ago, but struggled to recall the exact date, year, or season of the incident.
• Despite the statute of limitations having expired, the case proceeded in a Manhattan court.
• An interview clip of Carroll on Anderson Cooper’s show, where she made controversial remarks about rape, was not allowed to be presented in court.
• Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and ordered to pay $83 million, after which Carroll appeared on MSNBC celebrating and discussing extravagant spending plans.
• Carroll later stated her pleasure in using the money to anger Trump and support women’s reproductive rights.
• The article notes Carroll’s past positive comments about Trump’s show ‘The Apprentice’.
• A reported Justice Department criminal investigation into Carroll for potential perjury surfaced, focusing on financial support from Democratic donor Reid Hoffman.
• Hoffman admitted to providing financial support through his nonprofit, stating it was to help a woman’s voice be heard.
• The article criticizes legacy media’s portrayal of the DOJ investigation as Trump seeking revenge.
• The author concludes that the case represents the weaponization of the justice system.