Trump delivered a victory over Iran. Now he’s negotiating it away The United States has achieved a significant military victory against Iran, weakening its nuclear program and missile capabilities, yet is now negotiating from a position of weakness. The article argues that the U.S. does not need a deal and should aim for the regime’s surrender or collapse, warning that any deal made now, similar to Obama’s approach, would empower Iran and restrain allies like Israel.

• The U.S. has achieved a significant military victory against Iran, setting back its nuclear program and degrading its capabilities.
• The article criticizes the ongoing negotiations, arguing the U.S. should not be making demands as if on equal footing.
• A deal would empower the Iranian regime, allowing them to restart their nuclear program and rearm.
• Iran has historically used delaying tactics and is currently counting on future U.S. administrations or domestic political pressure.
• The article condemns President Trump’s intervention to prevent Israeli strikes on Hezbollah, viewing it as a sign of weakness.
• A deal that does not compel Iran to dismantle its nuclear facilities and hand over enriched uranium would render the previous military actions largely a waste.
• Any agreement must include anytime-anywhere inspections, as Iran has a history of lying about its intentions.
• The author suggests continuing military pressure until the Iranian leadership collapses or becomes amenable to surrender.