Gigi
Not doing DMs. Aspiring Saunameister.
there’s a fine line between just doing things and just doing damage to things
Source: dergigi.com
Slopmonger
Source: www.etymonline.com
This avalanche is going to make maintainer overload even worse.
Source: daniel.haxx.se
You can tell by the way they are worded
Source: daniel.haxx.se
I complained and I complained about the high frequency junk submissions to the curl bug-bounty that grew really intense during 2025 and early 2026. To the degree that we shut it down completely
Source: daniel.haxx.se
The AI tools will improve further and the researchers can find new and different ways to prompt the existing AIs to make them find more.
We have not reached the end of this yet.
Source: daniel.haxx.se
AI powered code analyzers are significantly better at finding security flaws and mistakes in source code than any traditional code analyzers did in the past
Source: daniel.haxx.se
My personal conclusion can however not end up with anything else than that the big hype around this model so far was primarily marketing
Source: daniel.haxx.se
curl is one of the most fuzzed and audited C codebases in existence
Source: daniel.haxx.se
The source code consists of 660,000 words, which is 12% more words than the entire English edition of the novel War and Peace.
Source: daniel.haxx.se
Completely unscientific poll on Mastodon about people’s expectations for Mythos scanning curl
Source: daniel.haxx.se
lose touch
Source: larsfaye.com
you cannot understand code without engaging with it
Source: larsfaye.com
the countless failed attempts at trying to democratize coding while not understanding coding
Source: larsfaye.com
lean on them to brainstorm
Source: larsfaye.com
The financial, and intellectual, rug-pull could come at any moment
Source: larsfaye.com
It's not unreasonable to play this pattern forward, where we could be creating an industry where you need to pay for token consumption to accomplish something that used to be the product of your own critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Source: larsfaye.com
Every new model release follows the same pattern of high benchmarks, followed by hype, followed by the reality of usage and everyone complaining of them being "nerfed" and burning through 2x-3x as many tokens to get the same job done.
Source: larsfaye.com
the models themselves are built on shifting sands
Source: larsfaye.com
What used to be a skill that they could execute with just a keyboard and text editor suddenly required a subscription to an AI model provider.
Source: larsfaye.com
You cannot replace a deterministic system with a probabilistic one and expect zero ambiguity.
Source: larsfaye.com
What you say is often not what you mean, and LLMs fill in ambiguity with assumptions (or hallucinations), which leads to: more review, more agent revisions, more tokens burned, and more disconnection from what is being created.
Source: larsfaye.com
"To grow skills, people need to go through hardship. They need to develop the muscle to think through problems," he said. "How would someone question if AI is accurate if they don't have critical thinking?"
Source: larsfaye.com
effectively using Claude requires supervision, and supervising Claude requires the very coding skills that may atrophy from AI overuse
Source: larsfaye.com
It actually is different this time.
Source: larsfaye.com
a higher level of ambiguity is not a higher level of abstraction
Source: larsfaye.com
in an ironic twist of fate, it's the individual's critical thinking skills and cognitive clarity that AI tooling has now been proven to impact negatively
Source: larsfaye.com
only a skilled developer who's thinking critically, and comfortable operating at the architectural level, can spot issues in the thousands of lines of generated code, before they become a problem.
Source: larsfaye.com
pulls the slot machine lever over and over, iterating and reiterating with often multiple agent instances until it's done
Source: larsfaye.com
provide "good taste"
Source: larsfaye.com
respect the community, and only share what is truly relevant
Source: rmoff.net
the community would be better off without your contribution
Source: rmoff.net
If you dump a complex PR into a project without due care, you’re obligating the reviewers to go through the code and for them to explain to you why it can’t be merged.
Source: rmoff.net
Asymmetry of Bullshit
Source: rmoff.net
another way of showing respect to the community is to be very open and clear about if, how, and where you’re using AI in your contribution.
Source: rmoff.net
Read the room, and get a feel for whether they’ll welcome with open arms your AI slop—or not.
Source: rmoff.net
the netiquette is always to "lurk"
Source: rmoff.net
Respect
Source: rmoff.net
Throwaway tools are just fine.
Source: rmoff.net
Does your offering contribute anything
Source: rmoff.net
thoughtful and careful design
Source: rmoff.net
AI is a powerful tool, and I will argue with anyone for the case that it’s pretty much a dereliction of one’s job to not be including it in one’s toolbox.
Source: rmoff.net
Built with AI, not by AI
Source: rmoff.net
with AI-generated content, whether a vibe-coded app or a blog post, the same applies.
Source: rmoff.net
Who cares.
Source: rmoff.net
Sharing content online is wonderful.
It’s pretty much what made the internet what it is today.
Source: rmoff.net
common decency and taste
Source: rmoff.net
with the care and good intent of a human
Source: rmoff.net
There’s good 'slop' and bad slop
Source: rmoff.net
AI slop is driving up the noise, and making the signal more and more difficult to discern
Source: rmoff.net