Blaze Media

News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life.

Cover image for Homeowner fatally shoots squatter in his vacant house — but attorney says self-defense may be hard to prove

Homeowner fatally shoots squatter in his vacant house — but attorney says self-defense may be hard to prove

An Oklahoma homeowner was arrested and jailed after fatally shooting a squatter in his vacant residence earlier this month — and an attorney is saying a self-defense claim may be difficult to prove.Timothy Smith, 59, is facing charges of first-degree manslaughter and reckless conduct with a firearm after shooting a squatter in his vacant house in Oklahoma City on May 1, KOCO-TV reported.'At trial, I'm sure the defense will be self-defense. What's going to make that difficult? He told the police that he didn't see a weapon in the hand of the victim.'Smith on Friday remained behind bars in the Oklahoma County Detention Center. Jail information indicates Smith's next court date is June 18 and that he's also charged with assault and battery with a deadly weapon.Smith told detectives he and his daughter checked on his house after having previous issues there with homeless people, KOCO reported.Smith entered the home with a gun and found Justin King in the back bedroom with a woman, the station said.Smith and his daughter told the pair to leave, but Smith said King stepped toward him, KOCO reported.With that, Smith aimed at "the area" of King, and the gunshot struck King in the neck, the station said.Criminal defense attorney Ed Blau told KOCO a self-defense claim on Smith's part is complicated because Smith was not living in the home at the time of the shooting."There's not the death penalty for squatting in the state of Oklahoma," Blau told the station. "You can't just take a gun in and shoot somebody."Blau added to the station that a self-defense argument also may be difficult to prove because Smith admitted to detectives that he did not feel threatened.RELATED: Couple returns from vacation to find squatters who ate their brisket, drank their alcohol, and left meth in car, police say "It would be difficult to have a stand-your-ground defense hold up," Blau noted to KOCO.The attorney added to the station that "at trial, I'm sure the defense will be self-defense. What's going to make that difficult? He told the police that he didn't see a weapon in the hand of the victim."Blau also told KOCO that while Oklahoma's Castle Doctrine allows homeowners to use force against intruders in their primary residences, it's different for vacant houses."If a trespasser or a burglar breaks in or comes into your home that you live in, and you're there, you can pretty much shoot them or do whatever you want to with them because of the Castle Doctrine here in Oklahoma," Blau told the station. "In a situation like this, an abandoned house, it's much different. You can't go in, put yourself in a situation, and say, 'This is my house, so I felt I had the right to shoot him.'"Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Sick of Microsoft's preinstalled propaganda on your PC? Block it now.

Sick of Microsoft's preinstalled propaganda on your PC? Block it now.

Microsoft’s leftist roots run deep, from its problematic co-founder Bill Gates and his “philanthropic” ventures to its partnership that gave birth to MSNBC — recently rebranded to MS NOW — which regularly spews left-wing talking points dressed up as actual facts. It even went out of its way to stuff leftist news stories into the widgets bar of every Windows computer via its MSN news aggregator, a service that prioritizes left-wing content over the right. That’s all about to change, though, as a string of complaints over Windows’ waning security and stability lead Microsoft to make its operating system a little more user-friendly, and the MSN feed is one of the first bad ideas on the chopping block.A brief history of MSNMicrosoft launched the Microsoft Network all the way back in 1995, and the company has crammed it into the desktop operating system ever since. Debuting on Windows 95, it started as an online dial-up service meant to compete directly with the early internet juggernaut that was AOL.One year later, Microsoft secured a lucrative joint venture with NBC News. In an effort to consolidate power across established cable TV and the new internet machine, the companies formed MSNBC. The nexus of their partnership saw that NBC News continued to provide 24-hour news coverage through conventional channels while Microsoft delivered those stories to its online users, boosting viewership ratings for both brands on the way to the top.By 1998, Microsoft spun the MSN brand out into the news aggregation service known today as MSN.com. For maximum visibility, Microsoft set MSN as the homepage of its Internet Explorer browser, which, at the time, dominated the web with a 90% market share over second-place competitor Netscape Navigator. You can even see an early version of the original MSN.com thanks to web archives.Microsoft ultimately walked away from MSNBC in 2012, selling its stake in the partnership to pursue its own venture. No longer in need of NBC’s reporting alone, Microsoft became an independent news distributor under MSN.com. This move would give Microsoft full control over which news outlets it chose to feature, as well as the right to hoard the spoils of its ad revenue from these stories. To make MSN virtually unavoidable, Microsoft injected its media influence into the Windows task bar in late versions of Windows 10 and all of Windows 11 under the name Microsoft Start. Now, any time you glance down at the task bar on your Windows PC, you’ll see messages from MSN that cover weather, finances, “breaking news,” and other topics, all begging for you to click and read.Today, the MSN feed is one giant leftist propaganda billboard meant to promote any outlet that doesn’t espouse right-leaning ideas or values. What’s worse is that Microsoft can use this baked-in “feature” to serve left-wing content by default to Windows machines at workplaces, schools, and homes around the nation. Everywhere. Screenshot by Zach Laidlaw/Windows 11Microsoft’s mission to win back user trustUnfortunately for Microsoft, a series of blunders have left users unhappy with the company’s portfolio of platforms and services. Here are just a few of its recent mistakes.Windows has suffered from several critical bugs since the start of the year, all chipping away at OS security and eroding user trust.Microsoft’s aggressive push to inject its AI platform, Copilot, into every app and service has been poorly received, with users complaining about its ubiquitous integration that has only complicated usability.Xbox has suffered from major annual losses, with significant drops in hardware earnings and a small drop in software revenue.Where Windows once dominated the low-tier and mid-tier PC market, Apple’s new affordable Macbook Neo poses a significant threat to a computer segment that Microsoft historically kept mostly to itself.In short, Microsoft is feeling the heat of competition, self-inflicted failures, and customer dissatisfaction on multiple fronts, and the only way to earn back user trust is to fix some of its more egregious mistakes. One of these is Windows’ user experience.A new ‘Start’ for WindowsMicrosoft Start is divided into two sections — the “Discover” view is powered by MSN propaganda, and the “Widgets” view shows only pertinent information without political commentary. By default, Microsoft Start opens to the Discover feed, filled with news stories designed to capture your attention. It’s clickbait. Meanwhile, the more useful Widgets are hidden behind an extra click; the default widgets include useful information, like weather, sports, finances, events near you, and a couple of other stragglers.In an upcoming Windows update, Microsoft Start will show the Widgets view first, with the Discover feed as optional. Don’t get too excited, though. Microsoft will continue to pack left-wing stories into Microsoft Start, but on the upside, users can soon ignore it wholesale, making PCs a little less politically intrusive.When asked about the decision, Microsoft said, “We're working to make Widgets feel less distracting and overwhelming by making the experience quiet by default. To do this, we're testing a new set of default settings designed to reduce unexpected alerts and visual interruptions.”Get rid of MSN nowThe refreshed Microsoft Start is currently only available in preview builds of Windows for developers. However, you don’t have to wait to banish the MSN feed from your taskbar. If you really want to kick it to the curb now, open Microsoft Start, click on the Settings gear at the bottom, uncheck the green toggle beside “Discover,” and that’s it! Microsoft Start will now default to the widgets view, which you can customize to your liking. Screenshots by Zach Laidlaw/Windows 11You’re now free from leftist propaganda, at least in this section of your Windows PC.

Cover image for Rural America’s new plague: Hicklibs and fail-libs

Rural America’s new plague: Hicklibs and fail-libs

Rural America was once a refuge from radical leftists. Fewer amenities and job opportunities were a price some conservatives were willing to pay if it meant their traditional values and patriotism didn’t have to compete with progressivism.But those pastoral sanctuaries are being blotted out one by one thanks to two new phenomena: hicklibs and fail-libs. “As media and universities became more radical, their disciples moved into rural America through government-mandated institutions like schools and libraries,” says BlazeTV host Auron MacIntyre.“Thus the hicklib was born.”A hicklib, MacIntyre explains, is “usually a social outcast, a failson who needs a moral explanation for why he hates the community he never fit into.”“His resentment searches for a theory that will dignify his rage, and the progressive missionaries installed in his local institutions are happy to provide one,” he says.The message is one of moral superiority: America is evil; those who disagree are “racist, sexist, backwards religious fanatics, destroying the lives of minorities"; and “white Christian culture” is the real evil in the world.“The hicklib's failures to fit in become proof of moral superiority,” says MacIntyre.Having found a solution to his inferiority complex, he sets out on a new mission.“The hicklib shows up at town council meetings in a Black Lives Matter shirt to denounce minority oppression in a community with no actual black people. That absence naturally becomes further proof of the town's intolerance,” says MacIntyre.“He loudly organizes Pride events attended by two other hicklibs. That little clique stages protests, distributes flyers, and imitates urban activist rituals. By practicing the sacraments of their faith, they hope to summon the spirit of the age to judge their reactionary little town.”The hicklib, MacIntyre argues, has become a “plague” for rural communities.But as plagues often do, the hicklib has evolved.“As the value of college degrees collapse, a new breed is emerging: the fail-lib,” says MacIntyre.Unlike the failure-to-launch hicklib, the fail-lib is outwardly successful.“The fail-lib worked hard in high school and gave progressive teachers every approved answer. She wrote her college entrance essay on the oppression of trans women of color in coal mining. On campus, she became an activist. She secured a degree in some woke humanities discipline and earned straight A's by repeating everything her communist professor told her,” MacIntyre illustrates.But despite her academic success, the fail-lib fails to land the “cushy corporate HR job” her expensive college degree promised her. Turns out, college degrees no longer come with the status they used to, and the “poor, oppressed immigrants” she’s long defended are now the preferred candidates.Instead of moving to a big, liberal city like she planned, the fail-lib is forced to dwell among the rural “townies” she disdains.She “was promised luxury and elite influence; now she serves the people she despises while searching for any opportunity to make their lives worse,” says MacIntyre, speculating that the rise of artificial intelligence will only “intensify this problem.”“The fail-lib might make less money than you; she may be less respected than you; she may even be despised by the townies she once mocked, but in her heart, she knows she's superior, and nothing could ever convince her otherwise.”To hear more, watch the video above.Want more from Auron MacIntyre?To enjoy more of this YouTuber and recovering journalist's commentary on culture and politics, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for Canada-US coalition emerges against Mark Carney's surveillance bill

Canada-US coalition emerges against Mark Carney's surveillance bill

What happens when a government can order technology companies to create a back door into encrypted communications that even they cannot access?A rare cross-border coalition of Canadian civil-liberties advocates and Republican lawmakers is warning that Canada's proposed surveillance legislation could threaten privacy rights on both sides of the border.'Privacy is not a luxury in a free society.'Sweeping vulnerabilitySupporters of proposed Bill C-22 say such powers are necessary to help law enforcement investigate terrorists, organized crime, and other serious threats in an age of encrypted messaging. Critics counter that once a vulnerability is built into a system, it cannot be confined to one country, one agency, or one investigation.Last Friday, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms presented a petition to the office of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. More than 40,000 people signed the petition opposing Bill C-22, which would expand the government's ability to obtain electronic communications and other digital evidence during criminal and national security investigations.US oppositionVPN providers are already threatening to leave the Canadian market if the bill becomes law. In a May 7 letter, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, warned Canada's Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree that the legislation could jeopardize privacy rights in both countries."Canada's Bill C-22, currently under consideration in Parliament, would drastically expand Canada's surveillance and data access powers in ways that create significant cross-border risks to the security and data privacy of Americans," the lawmakers wrote."We write to express our concerns that, if enacted, Bill C-22 would allow Canadian government officials to compel American companies to build backdoors into their encrypted systems, thereby introducing systemic vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers, foreign adversaries, and cybercriminals."The lawmakers also warned that the bill's language is sufficiently broad to permit secret ministerial orders."If a U.S.-based provider is forced to redesign its system to facilitate Canadian authorized access to content that is currently inaccessible even to the provider itself, the resulting capability cannot be geographically limited," they wrote. "This directly threatens the privacy of U.S. persons who expect and depend upon robust encryption to protect sensitive communications, health data, financial records, and personal correspondence from unwarranted intrusion."RELATED: Albertans are ready to vote on Canadian secession — so why is their premier stalling? Separatist leader Mitch Sylvestre at a rally in front of the Elections Alberta headquarters in Edmonton, Canada. Henry Marken/Getty ImagesStark termsAt a Friday news conference before submitting the petition to Carney, JCCF board member John Robson, a prominent Ottawa historian and journalist, described the bill in stark terms.“I'm here on Parliament Hill today because we are delivering a petition with 42,344 signatures asking Parliament not to proceed with Bill C-22 ... because [Prime Minister Mark Carney] is the moving force behind this bill, and we're hoping to persuade him that all these signatures from Canadians across the country ... represent legitimate, serious concerns about the scope of this bill,” Robson said.Robson noted that many Canadians and the constitutional scholars at the JCCF “are concerned about Bill C-22 because it would require service providers to compile Canadians' electronic data, to develop systems for extracting information from it and turning it over to the government.”“It's not that Canadians ... are against law enforcement having appropriate powers, including to fight organized crime,” Robson said. “It's one more ham-fisted way of targeting ordinary, law-abiding people instead of adopting tailored measures suitable to the real crime problems. And privacy is not a luxury in a free society.”

Cover image for Are Christians wise to ignore the alien/UFO debate? This answer may surprise you.

Are Christians wise to ignore the alien/UFO debate? This answer may surprise you.

As theories about aliens, flying saucers, and disclosure swirl in the wake of the UFO file dump, an Allie Beth Stuckey interview from a few years ago has resurfaced.In 2023, the “Relatable” host interviewed Jeremiah Roberts and Andrew Soncrant, hosts of the popular Christian apologetics podcast “Cultish,” a show that explores cults, high-control religious groups, and related movements from theological, sociological, and psychological angles.Allie cut straight to the chase and asked the duo if aliens, UFOs, and the like are even something Christians should concern themselves with: “I could see a lot of people listening to this and be like, ‘Well, that's just too much for me. It's kind of scary. It's kind of overwhelming.’ … Why do Christians — why should Christians really care about this?”The answer they gave was compelling. According to Roberts and Soncrant, the alien conversation “shouldn’t be taboo” for Christians. If anything, it’s a subject that demands a biblical response.“Everything — all the creation, both visible and invisible — they're created by Christ and for Christ,” says Roberts, “so we as Christians, we should have confidence that this whole discussion of aliens, demons, unidentified aerial phenomena exists in the universe that Christ is upholding by the word of his power, so that's why this is something as Christians we can't ignore.”Soncrant agrees and cites 1 Peter 3:15: “But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.”“We need to be able to have a defense — a reasonable defense — for what we are seeing with this phenomenon,” he says.Soncrant argues that when Christians “shrink back from popular culture,” they “end up letting the secular world interpret the evidences through their own presuppositions and come up with conclusions that are antithetical to the biblical worldview.”“We need to be in God's word, and we need to be speaking out in the public sphere. That's why God commands us to,” he declares.Roberts notes that when they first began “Cultish” in 2018, his friend and Presbyterian minister Colin Samul reached out and urged them to prepare to speak on the alien/UFO subject.Samul predicted they would see “the whole UFO conversation showing up in the news on a regular basis” and encouraged them to “embrace” the subject in a biblical way so that they could then field questions from their audience.“And sure enough, a lot of what he initially talked to me about has come to fruition,” says Roberts.Today, both he and Soncrant continue today to address the alien/UFO debate through a biblical lens, offering a reasoned Christian response to recent UAP disclosures and the growing cultural fascination with non-human intelligence.Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for John Cornyn’s defeat could be the end of the GOP establishment

John Cornyn’s defeat could be the end of the GOP establishment

As soon as polls closed in Texas on Tuesday, the Associated Press called a decisive victory for state Attorney General Ken Paxton, presumably ending Sen. John Cornyn’s 35-year political career. The 30-point margin was also another feather in Donald Trump’s cap.“Last night was very powerful,” the president said at the start of Wednesday’s Cabinet meeting at the White House. In an earlier Truth Social post, he called Cornyn a friend and promised to headline “big, beautiful rallies” for Paxton in the upcoming months.For the rest of the day, Trump posted screenshots of news outlets covering a 100% success rate in primary endorsements so far this year.'It’s an all time total collapse and embarrassment for the GOP establishment.'In addition to showcasing Trump’s endorsement weight, the runoff election results also exposed the weakness of the Senate Republican establishment. For months, National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Tim Scott took to the morning news shows extolling Cornyn’s virtues while insisting that he was the key to keeping Texas safely red. The NRSC posted lists of Paxton’s various personal and professional scandals, as Cornyn called his opponent an embarrassment.In his concession speech Tuesday night, Cornyn committed to supporting Paxton as the party’s nominee, despite spending months calling him scandal-ridden and morally unqualified to hold office. Chastened Senate Republicans are likewise reversing course.“A vote for Ken Paxton in November is a vote for a safer, stronger, and more prosperous America. He has my endorsement and support,” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) posted to X on Tuesday night. He had previously endorsed Cornyn. “[James] Talarico is too radical for Texas. Ken will be a key member of our Senate Republican majority fighting for America First.”The same night, the NRSC deleted every critical post of Paxton it had made over the past year, even though its statement on the general election does not mention him by name. Some conservative activists now want the organization to clean house. Breitbart News Washington bureau chief Matthew Boyle personally tagged NRSC staffers in posts on X, needling them for backing the wrong horse.“It’s an all time total collapse and embarrassment for the GOP establishment,” Boyle wrote.The NRSC faced a dilemma that Paxton’s backers will now confront. One of the most senior Republicans in the Senate, Cornyn has been a GOP fundraising heavyweight — a potentially significant factor in what is shaping up to be a strong Democratic year. He was also a former NRSC chair in 2010 and 2012. He could have largely funded his own race.Paxton, however, will need party money to keep pace with newly emboldened Democrats who are pouring money into Talarico’s campaign. Furthermore, Paxton’s impeachment, messy divorce, and fraud allegations provide plenty of fodder for Democrat attack ads.RELATED: JD Vance might be unstoppable in 2028 Akos Stiller/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesTrump delivered his endorsement for Paxton on May 19 on Truth Social, after early voting had already begun in Texas. He did not notify the NRSC or Senate Republicans in advance of his post.“He essentially let them know he didn’t care about their preferences at all,” Josh Blank, director of research for the Texas Politics Project, told RCP. “From a Republican elite perspective, not only does it look like you have to spend more money in Texas now, but you have to convince your donors that Ken Paxton is a good vehicle for that money — and Paxton has a challenging past to reconcile.”As if on cue, the first Talarico ad dropped by Democrats detailed the many controversies that have dogged Paxton’s career. His wife filed for divorce in 2025, citing adultery. Former staffers have testified that he used his office to convince a friend to give his mistress a job.In 2023, the Texas House of Representatives impeached Paxton on 20 articles for bribery, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power, but the state Senate voted to acquit and reinstate him. In 2024, he paid $300,000 and completed community service to settle an indictment for securities fraud.Nevertheless, Cornyn’s re-election bid was already flailing even before Trump weighed in. Conservative voters were not enamored with his 2022 efforts to pass a bipartisan red-flag law. Last year, the National Association for Gun Rights PAC endorsed Paxton. In 2023, Cornyn suggested Trump might not be electable any more, a comment he walked back in 2024 and last year. But Trump remembered.“I worked well with him, but he was not supportive of me when times were tough,” Trump wrote in a congratulatory post for Paxton.Despite outspending the Paxton campaign 17-1 in advertising alone, Cornyn remained in a statistical tie with his opponent for most of his campaign.“I think Paxton probably still could have won without Trump’s endorsement, but not at that magnitude. It was a blowout,” Conservative Partnership Institute Vice President of programs Rachel Bovard told RCP. “The Senate Republican conference is the chummiest place in America. Their political loyalties are to each other. So I think the dynamic is going to shift a little bit. The conference is being remade, and I don’t know that it’s going to be much help to Trump for the rest of the year.”RELATED: How Trump can fix his endorsement problem Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesFrom the beginning of Paxton’s bid, it became clear that the race would become about who could relate better to Trump. Cornyn was never the thorn in the president’s side that Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) or Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) often were.But things came to a head when some media reports indicated that Trump was about to endorse Cornyn, at the urging of Senate Republicans. Then Paxton delivered a public promise to drop his campaign if the Senate passed the SAVE America Act, a voting reform bill that would require proof of identity and citizenship to vote.“That was a pivotal moment in this election cycle,” Blank said. “Paxton demonstrated to Trump the lengths he would go to support his agenda and a key distinction between himself and Cornyn.”The SAVE America Act passed the House but has not yet moved through the Senate. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has said there is not enough support in the Senate to use a filibuster to pass the bill. Cornyn was one of several institutionalist members who said it is important to keep the 60-vote threshold, even if it means not passing the legislation. In March, Trump insisted that he would not sign any legislation until Congress passed the SAVE America Act, and he told the Senate to “kill the filibuster” to get it done.“Cornyn long held that he did not think the filibuster should be changed because he held a certain amount of fealty to the institution of the U.S. Senate. Paxton demonstrated his fealty to the president, and that was ultimately much more persuasive,” Blank said.Some analysts say this further cements Trump’s political kingmaker status, at least within the Republican Party, even while his popularity is sinking.“There is zero doubt tonight that Donald Trump is in complete and total control of the Republican Party,” pollster and political consultant Frank Luntz posted on X on Tuesday night.He can beat just about any Republican in just about any state in just about any primary. He is chief strategist, chief advocate, and chief voice of the GOP. His name may not be on the ballot in November, but make no mistake: Nothing and no one will have a bigger impact on voter behavior.Trump’s involvement hardly guarantees Paxton’s win in November. The attorney general has advantages with name recognition and his record of winning statewide elections in the past. But Talarico is surging with his own fundraising, and Texas Republicans sometimes have a turnout problem in years when Trump is not on the ballot.“We would expect most Cornyn-supporting Republican voters to support Ken Paxton come November, because they’ve voted for him in the past,” Blank said. “But if even a small share of Republicans decide that Ken Paxton is ethically unfit for office, as John Cornyn argued and spent nearly $100 million promoting, that makes a competitive election that much more competitive.”In a Wednesday appearance on "The Hugh Hewitt Show," Thune described the GOP’s newfound advocacy for Paxton.“Obviously, we are making the pivot,” Thune said. “He’s all-in, ready to go for the fall election, and not taking any time off, already on the phone raising money and all the things you’re going to have to do to be successful.”Editor's note: This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Cover image for Check your receipts: USPS postmaster steals thousands from small town while embezzling locals' money

Check your receipts: USPS postmaster steals thousands from small town while embezzling locals' money

A United States Postal Service employee has been caught dipping her hand into both public and private payments. Joyce Smith, a 51-year-old former postmaster, pleaded guilty to one count of theft by government employee after she was caught scheming with citizens' cash and government payments.'Smith even brazenly issued herself around $3,700 in money orders.'The Scott City, Kansas, ex-postmaster was caught when it was revealed that she had taken more than $57,000 from the USPS between January 2023 and February 2025.The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Kansas documented in a press release on Tuesday that Smith's biggest score came from typically normal services. Regular check payments for permits or mass mailings were reportedly routine for some of the post office's customers, and while Smith accepted the checks and provided the services, she did not log the receipts into the USPS records system.These payments constituted the majority of the money stolen, totaling just under $40,000. This includes checks for a total of $16,788 issued by the City of Scott City, Kansas, which has a population of just over 4,000 and a median income of $54,800.Other missing funds included $5,850 from the Scott County Landfill and another $17,108 in checks from a local newspaper. All of this money is unaccounted for, according to the USPS.RELATED: Postal worker allegedly tried to help detainee escape from ICE — and she was on duty at the time Joe Raedle/Getty Images In addition to taking money from the businesses and government entities, an audit indicated that Smith stole approximately $10,600 in cash payments from customers, but that was not all.Smith even brazenly issued herself around $3,700 in money orders. The government employee is also said to have embezzled another $3,400 from fees customers were paying for their P.O. boxes, bringing Smith's grand total of stolen funds to more than $57,400.U.S. Attorney Ryan Kriegshauser said that Smith likely thought her position would allow her to continue to "fill her pockets with money" that didn't belong to her and likely thought she would not get caught or face any consequences.Kriegshauser added that Smith's behavior "reminds us of why audits and other forms of government oversight of financial records are necessary."RELATED: Modern life isn't so bad (even if my furnace is out again) Joe Raedle/Getty Images The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General is currently investigating the case, but released a statement saying that the guilty plea was the result of "hard work and dedication" by special agents in the U.S. attorney's office.Special Agent in Charge Dennus Bishop said that law enforcement partners remain committed to "safeguarding the U.S. Mail and ensuring the accountability and integrity of U.S. Postal Service employees."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Caregivers should not have to lie to prove compassion

Caregivers should not have to lie to prove compassion

“Why not just stay in your lane and focus on caregivers?”A listener to my radio program for family caregivers reached out recently with that question. He appreciated the program, he said, but felt troubled when I “went political.” Then he added, “I reached out because I thought you would listen.”People retreat from politics because the noise exhausts them. But avoiding politics and refusing to morally examine the world unfolding around us are not the same thing.Fair enough. So I did. I listened while doing dishes and folding laundry because that is caregiver life. Then he asked what I thought.I spend my days speaking with families navigating catastrophic injury, dementia, trauma, chronic illness, memory care centers, prosthetics, bureaucratic failure, and exhaustion. Caregivers do not have the luxury of pretending reality is negotiable. Family caregivers now provide more than $1 trillion worth of unpaid care annually in the United States. We sit at kitchen tables staring at medical bills, insurance statements, pharmacy receipts, and impossible spreadsheets while trying to keep another human being alive, safe, and cared for.We pinch pennies. We know what groceries cost, but we also know the price of wound care supplies. We know what one wheelchair repair can do to a monthly budget. Meanwhile, we keep discovering billions in taxpayer dollars flowing through fraud and “quality learing centers” bilking people already struggling to pay the IRS.Caregivers notice things like that because caregiving quickly introduces a person to reality. So yes, I have become exasperated watching people in power lecture the country about “compassion” while families quietly drown at their kitchen tables.Recently, I was at a cancer center preparing for prostate treatment. Before I reached the medical history section, the form opened with questions asking what sex I identify as and what sex I was assigned at birth. I sat there staring at the page for a moment and thought: This whole trans movement seems built for virtue signaling until “she/her” has to get “her” prostate checked.Prostate cancer does not care how I identify.Then I asked the caller a question: “Which political worldview do you think put that language on that form?” When a civilization loses the ability to say plainly what a man or woman is, even inside medicine, something foundational has broken.My wife lost both legs after years of struggling with catastrophic injuries from a car accident decades ago. Not once did either of our sons say, “I think I should amputate my leg to look like Mom.” Had they done so, I would have sought psychiatric help immediately. If a physician had offered to remove healthy body parts from a confused child, I would have reported that doctor immediately.Again, I asked the caller, “Which political party aligned itself with removing healthy body parts from children?” In his silence, I pressed further: “And you’re wondering why I’m not staying in my lane?”I told him I am not here to carry water for the Republican Party. But right now, only one major political movement seems increasingly hostile to objective, biological, and theological reality. That matters to caregivers because we deal in reality every day.I asked him point-blank, “What do you actually like about the Democratic Party?” He repeated a phrase I have heard for years: “Democrats seem to be the party that cares.” The word “seem” leapt out.RELATED: What my colonoscopy taught me about stewardship Benjavisa/iStock/Getty ImagesSo I asked what exactly was caring about any of this. What is caring about allowing millions of illegal immigrants to overwhelm already strained schools, hospitals, and social systems while corporations benefit from cheap labor and America absorbs the consequences? What is caring about enabling addiction and destructive behavior? What is caring about encouraging irreversible medical interventions for confused children? What is caring about demanding that citizens deny biological reality to prove compassion?Political parties do not care. They exist to wield power. Government’s role is not to love us. Its role is to preserve equal justice, protect liberty, and provide conditions where citizens can work, worship, raise families, and pursue opportunity. That is very different from emotional branding.I also shared the moment something changed for me as a broadcaster. I watched Barack Obama stand before Planned Parenthood as president of the United States and say, “God bless Planned Parenthood.” I remember thinking: Which God? The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? The God who said, “You shall not murder"?I asked the caller, who professed Christianity, “How do you shake hands with that?” He said he agreed with much of what I said. “How would anyone know?” I asked. “I guess I have to say something,” he replied. “And that’s what I do on my show.”Then, I asked him to name one major idea currently being advanced by Democrats that he believed would genuinely strengthen the country. “They’re not in power,” he protested. “Ideas are power,” I countered. “Give me one. Not opposition to Donald Trump. An actual idea.”Finally, he admitted, “I can’t think of anything, and I haven’t been paying attention to the news.”I told him, “You have my number. If you come up with one major idea being advanced by Democrats that makes you say, ‘This is genuinely good for America,’ let me know, and I’ll talk about it on my program.”People retreat from politics because the noise exhausts them. I understand that. But avoiding politics and refusing to morally examine the world unfolding around us are not the same thing. I do not drift into politics for sport. I was preparing for prostate cancer treatment when politics invaded the top of the questionnaire.Caregivers deal with reality every single day.And in the exam room, reality should have the last word.

Cover image for Marine vet stuns Robertsons with biblical theory linking aliens, Nephilim, and demons

Marine vet stuns Robertsons with biblical theory linking aliens, Nephilim, and demons

Interest in the extraterrestrial continues to mount in the wake of President Trump’s recent order to declassify government documents on UFOs/UAPs. Theories about what aliens and flying saucers really are dominate social media every day.On a recent episode of “Unashamed,” Jase and Al Robertson along with Zach Dasher welcomed Marine veteran, Mighty Oaks founder, and author Chad Robichaux to the show to share his wild biblical theory on UFOs, giants, and demons. Whether or not what’s in the government files — historical sightings, military encounters, astronaut reports, etc. — is real or fake, Robichaux believes the church is obligated to address the subject so it doesn’t “throw people off their faith.”The majority of Christendom, he explains, holds an “anthropocentric view,” meaning it interprets humanity as the epicenter of the created cosmos.Robichaux fears that if something related to the extraterrestrial proves true, it would shatter this widely held worldview and throw Christians into a state of confusion and doubt.He highlights the biblical passages about the “secret places and secret things” of God’s universe and the numerous mentions of various celestial beings.“I think [humans] are special,” he caveats. “God sent His only son on earth to die for us. We're special and made in His image, but that doesn't mean necessarily we're the only one.”Robichaux believes that “The Book of the Watchers,” the first section of the Book of Enoch — an ancient Jewish text that expands on the origins of Genesis 6’s mysterious half-human/half-god Nephilim — provides reliable information as it “doesn’t contradict the gospel in any way.”According to the text, a group of 200 “Watchers” (angels assigned to watch over humans on the earth) rebelled by mating with human women, producing the Nephilim and necessitating the Noachian flood.But being neither fully human nor fully god, the Nephilims’ fate was unique, says Robichaux.“They can't go to eternal death or life like us, and so their spirits ... roam the earth, and this is what the Book of Enoch says: The demonic world that we're facing, the spiritual demons that we see in our world, are the disembodied spirits of these giants,” he explains.Perhaps modern UFO sightings and "alien" encounters are these same Nephilim spirits manifesting in physical or interdimensional forms to deceive humanity.If Christians want to stay rooted in truth, Robichaux argues that their anthropocentric perspective must be replaced with a Christocentric view that sees Jesus Christ as the hub of the cosmos’ wheel and humans — as well as every other created being — as spokes.If this becomes the Christian worldview, “little green men [coming] off a spaceship” won’t shake believers’ faith, he says.To hear more, watch the episode above.Want more from the Robertsons?To enjoy more on God, guns, ducks, and inspiring stories of faith and family, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for ‘Godball’: Are outspoken athletes Christianity’s most powerful evangelists?

‘Godball’: Are outspoken athletes Christianity’s most powerful evangelists?

Christian affiliation in America has been in steep decline for decades, with church attendance falling and nearly 30% of adults religiously unaffiliated. Pew Research Center has argued that there is “no clear evidence of a religious revival among young adults,” but sports fans might reach a different conclusion when tuning in to post-game interviews and press conferences, where they frequently hear athletes boldly professing their faith and giving glory to Jesus Christ.‘You’re not alone in seeing it, and you’re not alone in recognizing that it is a revival.’While Pew’s latest polling shows that the long decline has only plateaued, New York Times bestselling author and sports journalist Steve Eubanks believes there are undeniable and meaningful signs of revival, particularly among athletes.Teed upIn his forthcoming book, “Godball: How Athletes Are Saving Christianity,” which releases June 9, Eubanks takes a deeper look at the faith resurgence sweeping America and how these outspoken athletes have become Christianity’s most powerful evangelists. “I don’t think I would have noticed it if it hadn’t been for the event that you and I talked about three years ago,” Eubanks told Blaze News, referring to a 2023 incident in which the leading golf publication he then worked for attempted to censor his interview with professional golfer Amy Olson. When Global Golf Post refused to run the piece unless Eubanks removed Olson's references to her Christian faith and pro-life views, he “resigned on the spot.”At the time, Eubanks told Blaze News that widespread leftist bias had created a “sad state of affairs” for journalism. But now Eubanks says the experience had a silver lining: showing him that outspoken Christian athletes like Olson were more common than he realized. “I thought, ‘Wow, for an athlete to say something like this is extraordinary,’” Eubanks told Blaze News. “Well, then I started paying attention, and I thought, ‘Maybe it’s not that extraordinary; maybe it’s something that’s happening every day, and I just hadn’t noticed.’”Jesus firstCombing through press conferences and pre- and post-game interviews proved his hunch correct. More and more athletes seemed to be using the spotlight to profess their faith, sidestepping questions about athletic performance to give thanks to Jesus and share the gospel. “It’s a huge movement now,” Eubanks declared. “Really, it’s a revival.”RELATED: Exclusive: Golf writer says staff 'went ballistic' over story on pregnant golfer's pro-life, Christian views — and outlet's higher-ups refused to run it Steve Eubanks. Image source: Steve EubanksWhen asked why athletes tend to be more outspoken than other public figures, Eubanks pointed to the confidence that comes from succeeding in “one of the few meritocracies left.”LeaderboardSports also instill a willingness to resist the herd, Eubanks said. “From the time they were 7 or 8 years old, they were the leaders of the teams,” Eubanks said. “They had been told by the coaching staff, ‘Look, you’re the person who has to step up.’ And it’s a natural extension of that.”Eubanks asserts one of the main reasons these athletes are speaking out now is tied to the COVID lockdowns. He highlighted that an athlete’s career is significantly shorter than most other professions and that, during the lockdowns, everything they had dedicated their lives to was put on hold for an uncertain, lengthy period.“I just think COVID radicalized these kids,” he stated. “Those people realized that their entire lives could be taken away from them in an instant, and that it was important for them to stand up for the things that were really important and to go ahead and make these proclamations of faith.”He argued that athletes have become the “cultural drivers” of American society, more so than artists and musicians.Bad betsEubanks hopes that church attendance, particularly among young men, continues to grow, but expressed concern about one emerging threat within the sports community that could impact the current Christian revival. Image source: Steve Eubanks “If there’s anything that could derail it, it is the sports gambling,” Eubanks told Blaze News. “It can compromise the integrity of the sports themselves.”He detailed how throwing a game used to mean deliberately manipulating the entire outcome, but recently, some athletes have been indicted for allegedly engaging in spot-fixes, rigging small moments, such as a specific baseball pitch, for prop bets.Eubanks also noted that the barrier to gambling has been substantially lowered, from having to seek out a local bookie to using your phone to place numerous bets in seconds.“It’s almost the slot machine effect. There’s just enough bells and whistles to keep you engaged and to keep you throwing money down the rathole,” he said. “There’s a huge, huge addiction problem out there with this that we haven’t recognized yet, but that could really derail this revival movement in my eyes.”RELATED: When Archie Comics found Jesus: Strange artifacts from a once-Christian culture Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone. Erica Denhoff/Icon Sportswire/Getty Images Walking the walkTo sustain and grow the revival, Eubanks believes athletes must become more vocal about their faith and take a stand against immoral practices in the sports industry, including opposing sports betting and the playing of songs with obscene lyrics at stadiums and arenas.“In order to walk the walk, you’re eventually going to have to stand up and say, ‘This is not right; we shouldn’t be doing this,’” he said.Eubanks hopes that readers of “Godball” understand this revival movement is significant and expanding. He also aims to inspire young athletes to express their faith publicly, which could spark a domino effect of fans being drawn to Jesus Christ.“There’s an entire legion of people out here who are seeing exactly the same thing. You’re not alone in seeing it, and you’re not alone in recognizing that it is a revival,” he stated.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Florida deputy accuses driver of 'holding a phone' with her 'right hand.' But there's a big problem.

Florida deputy accuses driver of 'holding a phone' with her 'right hand.' But there's a big problem.

A Florida sheriff's deputy a few months back pulled over a driver and proceeded to tell her that she was "holding a phone" with her "right hand," which would be a violation of the state's wireless communications while driving law.The Palm Beach County Sheriff's deputy told the woman during the Feb. 11 stop in Lake Worth Beach that "we're doing an operation for distracted driving, and you drove past me holding a phone with your right hand," according to bodycam video of the traffic stop.'Hand to God — you did not have a phone in your hand?'But there was a big problem with that accusation.The driver quickly lifted up her right arm and showed the deputy that she has no right hand. In fact, it appears most of her right forearm is missing too.The motorist laughed and told the deputy, "So, obviously not!"RELATED: Video: Florida motorist decides to drive in reverse for a while — and then comes face-to-face with deputies The woman then asked the deputy, "So, you wanna just call this a day, or ...?"But the deputy persisted: "I don't want to call it day — you had a hand up manipulating a phone."The woman argued back, "You just said my right hand."The deputy replied that he "thought" he saw her "right hand."She then insisted, "You didn't" — and then held up her arm with no right hand and moved it closer to the open driver-side window."You didn't see me with my right hand," she added.The deputy persisted and asked the woman if she had a phone in her hand, not specifying right hand or left hand."I did not," she replied.Almost comically, the deputy came back with, "Hand to God — you did not have a phone in your hand?"The woman then raised her right arm that lacked a hand and replied, "Hand to God."The deputy then asked, "Your other hand to God — you didn't have a phone in your hand?"The woman then raised her left arm — which has a hand attached — and repeated, "Hand to God."With that, the deputy issued her a citation anyway for "wireless communication handheld while driving" — and the pair began sparring again before the deputy acknowledged to her that he did, in fact, say that he saw her holding a phone in her right hand and that she can take the citation to court.The woman posted video of the traffic stop on TikTok, WPEC-TV reported, and as you can imagine, the station said the case drew widespread attention.What's more, the station said the civil penalty amounted to $116.Naturally, the woman said she requested a hearing date and planned to fight the citation in court, WPEC said.But it turns out that it wouldn't be necessary.RELATED: Police stop bicycle-riding male for traffic violation; turns out he has a gun and then runs from cop. It doesn't end well. WPEC said a hearing had been scheduled for Tuesday of this week — May 26 — but the hearing was canceled after the case was dropped.In fact, court records show the citation was dismissed at the request of the deputy who issued it, the station said.WPEC added in a video short published Friday that the incident is now "under agency review."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for D-Day drama ‘Pressure’ celebrates forgotten values

D-Day drama ‘Pressure’ celebrates forgotten values

The new movie “I Love Boosters” asks us to root for thieves who steal designer clothes sans regret. Next month’s “Carolina Caroline” follows a pair of adorable, lovestruck thugs who swindle strangers for cash.Whatever happened to actual “good guys”?‘When he looked into the eyes of the 101st division, he took the time to ask their names, to shoot the breeze about fly fishing and their girlfriends.’Look no further than “Pressure,” a new World War II saga based on incredible true events.Extraordinary heroesHonor. Loyalty. Courage. Heroism. The ability to make a tough decision and stand by it, no matter what. No victim complexes or complaints about rough childhoods. Just extraordinary heroes taking history into their hands. It’s one reason we still can’t get enough of World War II films. Those qualities are front and center in this well-told tale. And it helps that the premise behind “Pressure” will strike audiences as unfamiliar, even shocking. Rain dayThe most consequential battle of World War II almost got rained out, a story that proves a snug fit for America’s 250th birthday. Brendan Fraser stars as Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the supreme commander ready to storm the beaches of Normandy and liberate northwest Europe. That risky plan required an assist from Mother Nature.Would the forecast allow for a massive amphibious assault? Or should the Allied powers wait a few days, even weeks, jeopardizing the element of surprise in the process? Andrew Scott of “Fleabag” fame plays James Stagg, the meteorologist brought in to advise Gen. Eisenhower on the best path forward. He predicts that conditions will turn D-Day into a disaster. Is he right, or does the existing weather expert (Chris Messina) have the right forecast? Earned respectFraser, the “Whale” alum who once again changed his physique to play “Ike,” told Align why he admires the man who not only helped win the war but later became a two-term U.S. president. “He was an excellent communicator; he was a diplomat of sorts,” Fraser said. “He conducted military operations over dinner tables. Apparently he was very funny and charming at them. ... That’s a form of communication too.” There was a method to his unorthodox ways, the Oscar winner said. “He did all this because he cared intensely about the troops’ well-being,” Fraser said. That extended to bonding with the men facing daunting odds of survival, especially in the D-Day invasion. “When he looked into the eyes of the 101st division, he took the time to ask their names, to shoot the breeze about fly fishing and their girlfriends. He was respected because he earned it. ... It was almost like a secret weapon in the operation,” the actor noted. “They wanted to please him, and they knew what they were up against.” RELATED: 'Call Sign Courage': One soldier's fight against creeping Marxism in the military Root/CauseHistoric battleDirector Steven Spielberg’s “Saving Private Ryan” captured the early stages of the Normandy invasion without flinching. It’s one of the goriest war sequences ever shot, showing how soldiers ran toward a wall of bullets that took hundreds of lives in a flash. “Pressure” doesn’t attempt to out-do Spielberg’s version, but the film shows how the beaches were quickly stained a deep red color. “It was no secret that they were going into a bare-knuckle fight with a chainsaw,” Fraser said of that historic battle. The project gave Fraser, now gearing up to shoot another “Mummy” film with co-star Rachel Weisz, an appreciation for Ike’s role in history. “He was the type of leader who did not want to punish his foe, his enemy. ... He didn’t let him off the hook, either. ... He partnered with them, neutered them that way, and made them accountable,” he said. Little-known perspectiveFraser’s co-star, Irish actress Kerry Condon, gets a less splashy but still consequential role in the war drama. She plays Captain Kay Summersby, Gen. Eisenhower’s loyal aide. “She brought the emotional intelligence when the men were struggling,” the actress said of her role, including a critical subplot involving Stagg’s pregnant wife. Summersby would later move to the U.S. and become captain in the Women’s Army Corps.Many moviegoers may not have realized the role weather played in the D-Day invasion. Count Condon among that group. “It was shocking to think it was one person who changed the course of history. ... That’s why I wanted to do [the film]. It’s a very interesting perspective on World War II.”

Cover image for Ranked-choice voting’s losing streak gets longer

Ranked-choice voting’s losing streak gets longer

It has been a dismal year for ranked-choice voting.RCV allows voters to rank candidates instead of choosing one. It then runs multiple rounds of counting, adjusts rankings, and discards “exhausted” ballots to determine a winner.Lawmakers, courts, cities, and voters are increasingly rejecting a system that makes elections harder to understand and easier to distrust.Two states have already banned it. One state’s pilot program was phased out. A statewide ballot proposal failed to qualify. Several city councils rejected it. A state supreme court struck down an expansion bill. And the year still has months to go.The states that banned RCV this year were Indiana and Ohio. The Ohio legislature first introduced a ban in 2023. It passed the Senate but not the House. This year, lawmakers passed it through both chambers on the second attempt, with Sens. Theresa Gavarone (R) and Bill DeMora (D) leading the effort. Republican Gov. Mike DeWine signed the bipartisan bill into law in February.Indiana acted even faster. Lawmakers introduced a similar ban and enacted it two months later. The legislation reflected growing concern that RCV makes elections less transparent and harder for voters to trust.“It is important to ensure Indiana’s voting system is secure and accurate for Hoosier voters. Having to rank each candidate could end up being a vote against the voter’s intended candidate, creating confusion and frustration, which is why we need this law in place,” said state Sen. Blake Doriot (R), the bill’s sponsor.RCV supporters also suffered a setback in Utah, where the pilot program ended this year. Before the program closed, more than 20 cities tried it, but supporters never moved the state toward broader adoption. Multiple cities dropped out before the program ended.In Michigan, Rank MI Vote’s RCV ballot proposal fell 200,000 signatures short of qualifying. RCV donors can find one consolation: At least they will not have to spend millions on another failed ballot measure, as they did in six states in 2024.RELATED: Trump’s endorsement power keeps saving the wrong Republicans KC McGinnis/Bloomberg/Getty ImagesAlbuquerque, New Mexico, also rejected RCV. The city council voted it down 6-3. The bill’s sponsor claimed switching from the current runoff system would save money, but the proposal failed because of concerns over system upgrades, staff training, and a long public education campaign. Similar proposals also failed in Vista, California, and Appleton, Wisconsin.The District of Columbia offers another warning. Voters approved RCV, but the city has struggled to prepare for implementation. District residents will use the system for the first time in June, and a recent Opportunity D.C. survey found that 43% of voters remain unaware of the change. To address the confusion, the Board of Elections is spending $50,000 to educate voters.D.C. Councilmember Wendell Felder introduced emergency legislation to delay implementation until 2027. The bill failed, so voters and election workers will have little time to prepare.Finally, an effort to expand RCV in Maine was struck down in March when the state Supreme Judicial Court ruled the bill unconstitutional. Because the Maine Constitution requires a plurality for state elections, RCV remains limited to federal elections.Every year, ranked-choice voting’s backers promise simplicity, fairness, and reform. This year showed the opposite. Lawmakers, courts, cities, and voters are increasingly rejecting a system that makes elections harder to understand and easier to distrust.

Cover image for Jill Biden gaslights Americans with her biggest lie yet

Jill Biden gaslights Americans with her biggest lie yet

The June 27, 2024, debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden will go down in history as one of the most disastrous performances ever delivered by a presidential candidate. Many say that Biden’s shaky delivery, verbal stumbles, and moments of confusion sunk his campaign right then and there, as it confirmed everyone’s fears that he was experiencing serious cognitive decline.Almost two years after the fact, former first lady Jill Biden is now suggesting that Joe might have been having a stroke during that debate — starkly contradicting her initial public praise of his performance.In a recent “CBS News Sunday Morning” interview, she said, “I was frightened because I had never, ever seen Joe like that before or since. Never. ... I don’t know what happened. As I watched it, I thought, ‘Oh my God, he’s having a stroke.’ And it scared me to death.”BlazeTV’s Sara Gonzales believes Jill Biden, whom she dubs “the former elder abuser in chief,” is “trying to rewrite history.” Sara points out that if Jill was actually concerned that her husband was having a stroke, then surely she would have sought immediate medical attention.But instead, she let him flounder until the debate was over and then gushed praise over his performance.Sara plays the infamous clip of Jill congratulating Joe, exclaiming: “Joe, you did such a great job! You answered every question; you knew all the facts!”“She was so concerned that he was having a stroke that she paraded him on stage to look like a toddler ... to tell him, ‘You answered all the questions, Joe. You did so good’?” Sara sarcastically asks.She then recounts how after the debate, Jill and Joe made a spectacle of going to Waffle House to celebrate.“If you really think your husband’s had a stroke, it doesn’t seem like that would be the best place to go for medical care,” she says.But conservatives aren’t the only ones who refuse to buy Jill’s new narrative.“Even CNN, I’ll point out, isn’t buying her bulls**t,” Sara says.She plays a clip of CNN’s Abby Phillip calling out the deceptiveness of Jill Biden’s updated story.“What kind of political system covers that up and makes it OK to lie to people about what everybody knows is true?” she asked on a segment of “NewsNight.”“You tell me, Abby!” Sara exclaims. “You guys were the ones who were doing it every day.”As for Jill’s claim that Joe’s debate performance was some kind of one-off incident, Sara says that we all have “receipts upon receipts upon receipts of Joe Biden declining.”She plays a compilation of the various blunders he made throughout his presidential career and after.“It was just an isolated incident, other than the entirety of his life now,” Sara mocks.“Jill Biden, I am calling you out. That is a lie. You did not think he was having a stroke.”To hear more, watch the episode above.Want more from Sara Gonzales?To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for Data brokers can learn all about you just from what online ads you see. Here's how to stop them.

Data brokers can learn all about you just from what online ads you see. Here's how to stop them.

Digital ads are a commonality across the internet. You see them in Google Search, social media feeds, and even on your favorite websites. If you spend enough time online, you might’ve grown accustomed to ignoring them. Unfortunately, a new study reveals that what has become a necessary annoyance to the modern web might also have the power to reveal personal and private information about your interests, beliefs, and more. Even worse, these personal details about you can be gathered without clicking on a single ad, thanks to AI.Websites can’t stop any company from collecting and using this data.The studyIn a study published by UNSW Sydney in early May, researchers revealed an alarming new trend about online ads: These seemingly innocuous bits of marketing materials on sites all around the web can be used to reveal and track a person’s most privately held values and beliefs – including political affiliation, degree of education, and employment status – simply by monitoring the advertisements users see online.To be clear, it’s not the ads themselves that can gather specific data about you, but it’s the collective presence of the ads displayed that reveal personal traits. Here’s how it works:Using Facebook as the catalyst for the study, researchers reviewed 435,000 ads distributed to a relatively small subset of 891 users. After monitoring which ads were served to each user, they ran the correlated data through a large language model and discovered four main points about the results:Researchers could infer users’ personal traits without accessing their browsing history or personal data on their devices. All they needed was a log of their ad history.User profiles could be created after a short browsing session (though they didn’t outline how long a session needed to be to make it work).AI-based personal trait matching rivaled and even exceeded human capabilities.The AI-powered process was both 200 times more affordable and 50 times quicker than relying on human analysis alone.The thing that makes this study so startling is that users don’t have to actively share any information about themselves, no cybersecurity loopholes or zero-day exploits are required, and platform holders behind today’s operating systems, web browsers, and websites can’t stop any company from collecting and using this data.RELATED: A secret bot army is phishing, scamming, and sabotaging our lives gremlin/Getty Images This isn’t the first time LLMs have been used to reveal extremely private information about online users. Earlier this year, we reported how AI can reveal the real identities of anonymous accounts simply by comparing writing styles.Should you be worried?At this point in the story, you might be wondering if you have anything to worry about. The answer is “maybe,” depending on how your smart devices are configured.The bright spot of the study is that your personal interests can’t be measured if the data is never recorded. UNSW Sydney noted that extensions, like those you’ll find in the Chrome Web Store, Safari Extensions, and Microsoft Edge Add-Ons are the likely avenue for data collection. The more extensions you have installed on your devices, the higher your chances are that your ad history could be abused. If you don’t have any extensions installed, your chances of ad data collection drop precipitously.That’s not to say that all extensions are bad. However, even the innocent ones have the power to view which webpages you visit and even the content on those pages. Ironically, another possible method for ad data collection are ad blockers. While blockers can effectively prevent websites from showing you ads, some may still access served ad data and gather it for user profiling. You especially want to watch out for ad blockers that claim to be free. Remember, if you’re not paying for the product, you likely are the product.Even without extensions in the mix, data brokers can still collect plenty of information about you, and you still don’t have to click on an ad to hand it over. The sites you browse on the internet are filled with cookies — little crumbs of data — that track where you go and which pages you click from site to site. Even if you don’t click on an ad, simply visiting a product page or website is enough to leave a cookie in your browser that tells brokers the things you like and the things you don’t. These can then be used to build profiles on your browsing habits to target you with other ads you might actually click, which you should never do, as evidenced by the stark rise in social media scams.Ways to protect yourself from ad data collectionStaying safe and anonymous online is an increasingly difficult task. However, if you want to give yourself the best shot at nullifying this ad data collection “exploit,” try out these tips:Remove all extensions from your preferred web browser. This is probably the top way to block bad actors from recording your ad data.Install a VPN. Many VPNs come with built-in ad-blocking technology. If you choose to add a VPN to your device, make sure it’s a RAM-based option with a no-log system that actively prevents the VPN provider from recording or saving user data. Some popular RAM-based VPNs include ExpressVPN, NordVPN, and CyberGhost VPN.Block cookies entirely. Some browsers will let you block all third-party cookies. Unfortunately, this may break some websites, so your mileage may vary.Clear out your cookies often. Set a reminder to delete your browser history and cached data every week or month. This can make it harder for sites to monitor your activity over time.Browse in private mode. While “private” or “incognito” mode won’t obscure your web traffic from your ISP, many browsers come with extra tools to reduce or block cookies and other tracking methods that brokers use.

Cover image for Immigration is changing American neighborhoods — and most people won't say it

Immigration is changing American neighborhoods — and most people won't say it

Immigration is a key issue affecting Americans, but not just in terms of border security.While border crossings have been going down, one glaring issue with American immigration is whether or not these immigrants are assimilating into American civic life — which in many cases, they are not.Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, tells BlazeTV host Allie Beth Stuckey that the president needs to “really double down on the importance of assimilation, the importance of wanting to be an American beyond getting the certificate that you’re an American citizen.”“The best way to be a pro-immigration country is to have laws that require immigrants to assimilate,” he says.“Americans want their country back. And I can think of no president, certainly in modern history, who better embodies the desire to do that than Donald Trump,” he adds.And as a "suburban mom,” Stuckey wholeheartedly agrees.“Those are the things I really see affecting my community. And it’s not only illegal immigration. And this is where I think the conversation has shifted on the right in a good way. I just don’t know the solution for it,” she says.“People are saying yes, illegal immigration number one, but also it doesn’t seem like our legal immigration is really prioritizing American interests,” she continues.“And when people see their communities, the neighborhoods that they grew up in completely shift, and when people see churches turning into mosques, I think most Americans are uncomfortable saying it, but there’s something unsettling about it,” she adds.“I’m not uncomfortable saying it,” Roberts responds.“We have to understand that this country was based on principles that came from Jerusalem, Athens, Rome, London, and Philadelphia,” he explains. “We are both Judeo and Christian in our founding. That doesn’t mean that there isn't room for other people, but it does mean that it’s possible in a country that is so generous toward immigrants that we might have too many people from the wrong places.”Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Cover image for When the government takes everything without proving anything

When the government takes everything without proving anything

Imagine you founded a company with a stop-smoking product that actually works — no nicotine, better than anything on the market. You are the largest investor. You take no salary. You build it into something real, serving 756,000 customers. You are doing exactly what America is supposed to reward.Then one night, without warning, without a trial, without any finding of wrongdoing, the federal government comes. The government freezes every account you own or are even associated with — personal and business accounts, life insurance, and retirement savings. A court-appointed receiver sells your office furniture. They tell you that you no longer have Fourth Amendment rights. They come for the wedding ring on your wife's finger.This attack sounds like some hypothetical scenario. It is my story.I am writing this so that every American understands just what weaponization by the government really means.The Federal Trade Commission came for me in 2018 using Section 13(b) of the FTC Act — a provision Congress created for injunctions only, not for seizing assets or freezing accounts. The receiver the agency installed consumed nearly $4 million of my money in fees before anyone proved the FTC did not have legal rights to my assets.When I went to court and asked for access to my own frozen money just to pay lawyers and keep my home, the government's response was: You can go live under the freeway for all we care.While this was happening, inspired by President Trump's Made in America initiative, I built VPL Medical — the world's first made-in-USA three-ply surgical face mask manufacturing operation, based in California, where I was born and raised.This was before COVID. When the pandemic hit, VPL Medical was ready. The Department of Health and Human Services awarded us a $14,500,000 contract to deliver 20,000,000 American-made masks to the Strategic National Stockpile. The factory was going to employ 400 Americans. The country didn't want masks from China, and we were ready to deliver.Then the FTC came for VPL Medical, too. The factory went dark for three months while Americans died and hospitals begged for PPE. The FTC's offer to reopen: Pay the receiver $25,000 per week to run my own company under a law that didn't authorize the demand. I refused. The receiver's first act was to cancel the HHS contract. Twenty million American-made masks and 400 American jobs gone.In April 2021, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in AMG Capital Management v. FTC that the commission had no authority to seek monetary relief. Nine justices. Zero dissents. My civil FTC case collapsed. The district court returned my company to me. Zero dollars — after four years of destruction, a factory closed during a pandemic, a $14.5 million federal contract canceled, and nearly $4 million consumed by a fraudulent receiver.There is no mechanism to get that back. You win. And you are still destroyed.My family and I moved to Ireland to take a break. We were through the nightmare and wanted to recover. Or so we thought.RELATED: Trump’s anti-weaponization fund puts GOP cowards on trial Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesWhen I flew home to see my dying father, I was arrested at Los Angeles International Airport. The Biden DOJ had indicted me for the same conduct the FTC had litigated for four years and won nothing from — conduct the prior Trump administration's DOJ had already reviewed and declined to charge.The Trump administration's own 2018 “No Piling On” directive explicitly prohibits this practice. The alleged consumer harm: approximately $154, across 756,000 customers who all received their product or a refund. My criminal defense costs: in the millions and climbing.What is happening in my case now has no precedent in American federal prosecution. The supervising AUSA withdrew in April 2025. No replacement has appeared in 14 months. There is no confirmed U.S. attorney supervising the case. The DOJ unit employing the trial attorney was abolished in September 2025. Thirty-one demands for that authorization have gone unanswered. The prosecution continues anyway.Six fully briefed motions to dismiss — covering fraud on the court, due process, double jeopardy, evidence suppression, and the “No Piling On” violation — have all been denied by District Court Judge Jesus Bernal, an Obama appointee.Every player in this case, with the exception of myself, is a Biden or Obama appointee. This is what Biden-Obama weaponization looks like — a rogue agency, an unauthorized prosecution, and politically appointed judges, all targeting an American entrepreneur who built American manufacturing and supported President Trump.I have filed a restitution claim with the DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund. I am not asking for sympathy. I am asking for what the rule of law promises: that the government must prove its case before it destroys you. Right now, for me, that promise has not been kept. I am writing this so that every American understands just what weaponization by the government really means.Editor’s note: This article was originally published by RealClearPolicy and made available via RealClearWire.

Cover image for Trump Derangement Syndrome Infiltrates America's 250th Birthday Concert

Trump Derangement Syndrome Infiltrates America's 250th Birthday Concert

Just days after concert details were released as part of the Great American State Fair celebrating the United States' 250th birthday, most of the musical artists have publicly expressed their intention not to perform.Freedom 250, the Trump-launched organization leading the celebration, released an outline on Wednesday detailing the “first round of star-studded entertainment & activations” [sic]. Beginning June 25, the 16-day national exposition on the National Mall is set to consist of “live entertainment, immersive exhibits, patriotic tributes, innovation showcases, cultural programming, and family-friendly attractions.”'It is inherently nonpolitical. It is a celebration of our country.'Nine artists appeared on the list shared by Freedom 250: Martina McBride, Bret Michaels, Vanilla Ice, C+C Music Factory, Young MC, Flo Rida, Morris Day and the Time, Vanilla Ice, Milli Vanilli, and the Commodores.But just as quickly as Freedom 250 announced the lineup, it started to crumble.Morris Day and the Time was the first act to disclose intentions to step away. The band’s official Facebook page posted, “Contrary To Rumor, Morris Day & The Time Will Not Be Performing At The 'GREAT AMERICAN STATE FAIR,'” captioning the post with a simple “It’s A No For Me.”Only a few hours later, Young MC posted on his Facebook profile, saying, “I HAVE INFORMED MY AGENTS THAT I WILL NOT BE PERFORMING AT THE FREEDOM 250 EVENT. The artists were never told about any political involvement with the event. And despite the claims by the organizers that the event is nonpartisan, SPIN magazine describes it as Trump-backed."The Commodores and Martina McBride followed suit by announcing similarly on their Instagram and X accounts respectively that they "will not be performing at the Great American State Fair.""[The Commodores] choose not to publicly affiliate with any single political party."McBride went on to claim that she "was presented with an opportunity to perform at a nonpartisan event but that turned out to be misleading."Bret Michaels posted on his Instagram profile that "what was presented to us as a celebration of our country has evolved into something much more divisive." Michaels also cited concerns over the safety of his "fans, band, crew, family, and myself.""Because of that, I have made the difficult decision to step away from this performance."RELATED: America at 250 Construction ahead of the Rededicate 250 and Great American State Fair events on the National Mall.Al Drago/Washington Post/Getty ImagesFreedom Williams of C+C Music Factory uploaded a lengthy video to his Instagram account during which he ranted about the heavy public backlash he received after his involvement in the event was announced. He initially claimed his booking agent "didn't mention Trump" and therefore he planned to back out: “So I told my agent, yeah, nah, I ain’t gonna be able to do that."Yet Williams spent most of the seven-minute, 13-second recording brazenly criticizing those who threatened to “cancel” him: “The day I let you motherf**kers tell me what to do is the day I die.”He added, “F**k Trump and f**k you too, but I just might do it,” leaving his attendance up for debate.Founding member of C+C Music Factory Robert Clivilles clarified his own position on X: "I was neither involved in, consulted regarding, nor have I endorsed the event. Any political, ideological, religious, or personal viewpoints expressed by Freedom Williams are his own and should not be interpreted as reflecting my views."As for Milli Vanilli, the "real vocalists" announced through a Facebook press release that they too will not be performing, stating, "Others using the name 'Milli Vanilli' that appear on the advertisement should be considered a tribute band."However, Fab Morvan, one side of the original duo group, said in a statement sent to Consequence that he "feel[s] honored to be a part of the Great American State Fair."Also still confirmed to appear is Vanilla Ice, with his management agency telling NBC News that the artist "is contracted and will perform at the Great American Fair.""He is proud to help celebrate America’s 250th Anniversary!” A spokeswoman for Freedom 250 hit back at these recent developments in an interview with The Hill columnist Judy Kurtz on Friday morning: "It is inherently nonpolitical. It is a celebration of our country.”She added, "We have a president that wants to celebrate 250 years of America … and that's how it was sold to performers.”Flo Rida did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Cover image for Newsom would rather pick fights than fix California’s fraud problem

Newsom would rather pick fights than fix California’s fraud problem

California is being ripped off. The state is losing billions of dollars to fraudsters every year, and the state’s leaders have done too little to stop them.While California’s population has dropped since 2020, Medi-Cal spending has doubled over the same time frame. How is this even possible? One reason is that per initial federal estimates, one out of every four Medi-Cal dollars is lost to fraud, for a whopping $50 billion in losses per year. This is an amount larger than the entire economy of some states.If federal estimates are correct, the state has lost some $200 billion to Medi-Cal fraud under Governor Newsom, not to mention other kinds of fraud using taxpayer dollars.The federal government must ensure that federal funding will be spent wisely by the states, not lost to fraudsters.In California alone, federal auditors have found 1.2 million ineligible individuals on Medicaid, with another 3.2 million enrollees found to be potentially ineligible.Auditors have flagged hundreds of thousands of individuals who were enrolled in Medicaid in multiple states at the same time — many of whom were flagged for fake or stolen Social Security numbers. Even worse, hundreds of millions of Medicaid dollars have funded benefits for the deceased.Fortunately, the Trump administration is taking on fraudsters like no administration in American history and holding California’s leaders accountable. Earlier this year, the White House announced it would withhold roughly $10 billion in federal funding from five states, including California, until they make reasonable plans for reducing fraud.This step is absolutely necessary: The federal government must ensure that federal funding will be spent wisely by the states, not lost to fraudsters.Remarkably, Governor Newsom’s response has been to attack the Trump administration for its anti-fraud efforts and even blame President Trump for California’s carelessness and laxity toward criminals, all while casting himself as an anti-fraud champion.This tactic might play well on Bluesky, but it is completely divorced from the facts and does nothing to solve the very real problem of taxpayer dollars being stolen.Unless the governor gets serious, California taxpayers could end up paying an even higher price as soon as President Trump’s new welfare reform law goes into effect. The president’s new law requires states to clean up their rolls and reduce improper payments or risk losing the share of the federal dollars that support Medicaid.RELATED: The Trump administration is cracking down on fraud Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesWith these shocking rates of waste, fraud, and abuse, California could lose a large amount of federal funding while it continues to bleed billions of dollars to fraudsters. California has wisely had a balanced budget amendment to the state constitution for more than a century, but this means that every dollar lost to fraud is a dollar taken away from other priorities.California can’t just print money. Fraudsters are stealing directly out of taxpayers’ pockets, and right now they are doing so on a massive scale.The good news is that there is a common-sense solution on the table right now in the State Assembly. Republican Assemblywoman Alexandra Macedo has introduced the Protect the Promise Act to help California reduce Medicaid fraud and lower the state’s improper payment rate.The bill would simply require more eligibility checks using more data. For example, it would require officials to cross-check Medi-Cal enrollment data with federal Medicaid enrollment data to ensure that people aren’t enrolling in multiple states, which is illegal. It would require the state to take immediate action when discrepancies are found.The bill wouldn’t affect Medi-Cal benefits in the slightest. But by dramatically slashing payments to ineligible people, it could save Californians billions of dollars by reducing fraud and preventing a loss of federal funds. In a balanced-budget state like California, this would free up more resources for other priorities.Medi-Cal was started to help Californians in need — not to enrich fraudsters with Californians’ hard-earned tax dollars. It is time for the state’s leaders to end the fraud crisis and finally protect the promise for the truly needy. Otherwise, Californians will pay a high price — one that is only getting higher.

Cover image for Dismembered remains of double amputee found in suitcase — Lyft driver's tip leads cops to arrest caretaker and 3 relatives

Dismembered remains of double amputee found in suitcase — Lyft driver's tip leads cops to arrest caretaker and 3 relatives

An attentive Lyft driver called Philadelphia police after seeing a gray suitcase on the news that belonged to a woman rider who apologized for the smell of the dirty wet clothing inside.Investigators now say 53-year-old Liza Ridley was transporting the remains of Vincent Good in order to dump them off so she could cash in on his Social Security checks.He said she carried a gray suitcase and left a fluid stain on the floor of his car.Good's family said he was funny and kind and would give nicknames to everyone he met.Prosecutors say that Ridley admitted to shooting Good in the head after the Lyft driver's tip led them to her door.Good's remains were found in the suitcase dumped at East Hilton Street in Kensington on May 22.A person searching for scrap metal first noticed the smell emitting from the suitcase, according to a statement from the Philadelphia District Attorney's office. Police also found remains in two industrial-size trash bags after investigating.Police sought help from the public and released a photo of the gray suitcase.A Lyft driver then contacted the police to tell them about the strange interaction she had with a woman transporting a suitcase with a strong foul odor on May 21. She said the woman carried a gray suitcase and left a fluid stain on the floor of her car.She also said that she believed she had driven the woman to Kensington.Astonishingly, she gave police a photograph of the woman."That Lyft driver had the wisdom to take a photograph of that passenger based on the suspicious indications that the Lyft driver was observing," District Attorney Larry Krasner said.Police were able to identify the woman as Liza Ridley, a registered home health aide for Exceptional Heart Home Care Services. She had been hired to care for Good and was also his girlfriend. Investigators say Ridley had her 55-year-old sister Bernadette Ridley, her 32-year-old daughter Liza Robinson, and Liza's 33-year-old boyfriend Gnaeus Daniels helped clean up the crime scene and disposed of evidence. Bernadette Ridley is also accused of helping dismember Good's body.The group is charged with a slew of crimes.Liza Ridley is charged with murder and abuse of a corpse, and her sister is charged with abuse of a corpse. All four suspects are charged with tampering with evidence and obstruction of justice, as well as conspiracy charges related to both crimes.RELATED: Illegal alien dismembered man who overdosed and flushed his organs in order to avoid deportation, police say Police said a forensic anthropologist will determine what date Good was killed and how he was dismembered. They believe the motivation for the alleged murder was the theft of Good's Social Security checks. "This case was quickly solved largely thanks to two Good Samaritan Philadelphians who came forward as crucial witnesses and shared vital information with law enforcement," Krasner said.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!